The Political Fix has a post up stating Lacy Clay is for Prop A. Doubtless this is timed to make it sound like he's finally made up his mind, but Clay was an endorser all the way. What's most interesting is the end of the article by Jake Wagman.
Their support comes as some in the African-American community are voicing opposition against the tax increase. An editorial in this week’s St. Louis Argus urged residents to vote no on Prop. A, citing the lack of Metro rail service in north St. Louis County.
“As you ponder whether another half-cent tax on your wallet or purse is worth it, consider the track record of Metro and its failed promises to improve public transportation in north St. Louis County,” the editorial stated. “Where is the money and the promise of improved bus service and light into our community? Late on arrival.”
I can't yet see it online at St Louis Argus, but this editorial echoes what Burns and others have been saying. The money spent on Metro never seems to serve the community. It always ends up in the pocket of construction companies and Democratic consultants who build where it's convenient instead of needed. As this video from Tom Shrout demonstrated in 2006, the new Metrolink stations were built without a source of long-term funding. The 2008 Prop M and 2010 Prop A are pitched as needed to shore up Metro in the light of drastic service cuts, but if Metro had not built unneeded and money-losing stations, it would be a lot easier to fund bus routes to areas in North St Louis and out in St Louis County.
Don't blame Prop A opponents for cuts to the poor - blame the politicians and management who created money-losing services that made the cuts necessary. Funding the Metro light rail as currently built and planning for its expansion is a utopian pipe dream that will fail to serve the needs of those who need transit the most.
Those serving the African American community get this, which is why they oppose Prop A. Those who need the flow of government dollars to pay their staffs and the unions support Prop A for politics, not people.
Time to call them on it. If Citizens for Modern Transit had no funding plan in 2006, why have they have taken hundreds of thousands of dollars to push for expansion? Is this about Metro, or lining the pockets of the politically connected?
